The hottest Robot Revolution is too fast or will l

  • Detail

Is the Robot Revolution too fast or will it lead to a surge in poverty

if you ask an economist or technical expert about the impact of automation on society, they will be happy to tell you that decades of reliable data show that automation creates and has experimental curves that show that there are more industrial opportunities than it destroys

for example, there are far fewer people working on farms now than before, because efficient machines complete most of the work. This technology has increased productivity and developed living standards. Therefore, more and more people begin to work in the leisure and entertainment industry, such as reception or hairdressing. They get higher income and more leisure time

if this pattern continues, people can imagine that the working hours will be reduced in the future. As predicted by johnmaynardkeynes in 1930, people's working hours will be reduced to 15 hours. (johnmaynardkeynes predicts that in the future, human working hours will be significantly shortened and vacation time will be significantly extended. In the 21st century, ordinary people only need to work three hours a day)

the guardian once dreamed of the future of automation: there will be fewer stores and fewer retail clerks in the future, and low paid retail and non-technical jobs will soon disappear automatically. What changes will people experience? However, there is a problem with these optimistic views, which only focus on a wide range of average values, with little consideration for personal experience. In Britain, the number of jobs created by technology is far greater than the number of unemployed. But for those who lost their jobs in car factories in Central England, this is not a good thing. They find that most of the new jobs are hard to reach

previous studies have not taken into account the pace of technological change, which may be achieved in the future, but the relationship between them will be faster. In other words, in the past few decades, most people have reported success and can gradually find new job opportunities, but the difficulty of finding a job may vary. But in the future, technological changes are fast and wide, and most people are unlikely to adapt easily

for governments of all countries, they urgently need to take measures to ensure that the development of robots will not further aggravate the social gap. Ideally, automation will improve productivity and overall economic growth, so it is tempting to invest funds in improving the level of automation. However, if there is no clear plan for the placement of laid-off workers, it will cause incalculable harm to millions of people

the robot revolution is coming. Will they bring wealth or further social stratification? As pointed out by the Institute of public policy 2015 (8th) dual use new materials forum, some workers are more valuable than automated tools. The Institute for public policy pointed out the special risks of low skilled industries and warned that the robot revolution could widen the already deep-rooted North South gap in Britain

the Institute of public policy calls for increased investment in education and retraining, and priority should be given to areas away from the capital, where people need to adapt because automation will change their jobs. If the government does not take action, the result is likely to be a surge in unemployment and poverty in places with the lowest level of technology, which is an unbearable price for the government

Copyright © 2011 JIN SHI